• Registration
  • Login
JETem
  • Home
  • About
    • Aim and Scope
    • Our Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQ
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
  • Visual EM
    • Latest Visual EM
    • Search Visual EM
    • Thumbnail Library
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit to JETem
    • Photo Consent
    • Policies
      • Peer Review Policy
      • Copyright Policy
      • Editorial Policy, Ethics and Responsibilities
      • Conflicts of Interest & Informed Consent
      • Open Access Policy
  • For Reviewers
    • Instructions for JETem Reviewers
    • Interested in Being a JETem Reviewer?
  • Topic
    • Abdominal / Gastroenterology
    • Administration
    • Board Review
    • Cardiology / Vascular
    • Clinical Informatics, Telehealth and Technology
    • Dermatology
    • EMS
    • Endocrine
    • ENT
    • Faculty Development
    • Genitourinary
    • Geriatrics
    • Hematology / Oncology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Miscellaneous
    • Neurology
    • Ob / Gyn
    • Ophthalmology
    • Orthopedics
    • Pediatrics
    • Pharmacology
    • Procedures
    • Psychiatry
    • Renal / Electrolytes
    • Respiratory
    • Social Determinants of Health
    • Toxicology
    • Trauma
    • Ultrasound
    • Urology
    • Wellness
    • Wilderness
  • Modality
    • Curricula
    • Innovations
    • Lectures
    • Oral Boards
      • Structured Interview
      • Communication Case
    • Podcasts
    • Simulation
    • Small Group Learning
    • Team Based Learning
    • Visual EM
  • Contact Us

Radiolucent Foreign Body Seen on Point-of-Care Ultrasound but not on X-ray

Julian Jakubowski, DO*

*Marietta Memorial Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Marietta, OH

Correspondence should be addressed to Julian Jakubowski, DO at dr.jakubowski@gmail.com

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21980/J8WS77Issue 4:1
UltrasoundVisual EM
No ratings yet.
Creative Commons images
Creative Commons images
Creative Commons images
Creative Commons images
Creative Commons images

History of present illness:

A 35-year-old male patient presented to the emergency department with left foot pain and swelling. He had sustained a puncture wound with a large wood splinter to the lateral aspect of the dorsum of his foot in the week prior. He believed that he had removed the entire splinter, but over the next week, the site became increasingly red, tender, and swollen without drainage.

Significant findings:

X-rays of the foot were obtained and no radiopaque foreign body was visualized. Due to high clinical suspicion for retained foreign body, a point-of-care ultrasound was performed by applying a high-frequency linear probe at the area of discomfort. In the long axis an ovoid focus of hypoechogenicity (orange outline) is visualized. Within this finding there is a linear focus (yellow line) of increased echogenicity measuring 1 mm in diameter and 1 cm in length. On short axis view, a rectangle focus (green dot) demonstrating shadowing (blue highlight) is seen.

Given the evidence of foreign body on ultrasound, incision and drainage was performed. It resulted in the removal of a 1 cm splinter along with small amount of purulent and serous fluid.

Discussion:

Whenever a patient has a traumatic injury that violates the integrity of the body, there is the possibility of a retained foreign body. It has been reported that missed foreign bodies are the second leading cause of lawsuits in emergency medicine.1 Despite the known risk of litigation, greater than one third of foreign bodies are missed initially on examination.2 This has frequently been attributed to a lack of imaging in conjunction with examination.3 X-rays are thought to be the most common imaging to screen for foreign bodies in extremity trauma.4 Unfortunately, many foreign bodies are not radiopaque on X-ray. Radiopaque foreign bodies are usually more dense than soft tissues and similar to bone density (e.g., metal, stone, or certain types of glass).5 Less dense foreign bodies are radiolucent and not seen on X-ray.

Ultrasound can be superior to X-ray in identifying these foreign bodies: one study showed soft-tissue X-ray had only 10% sensitivity for detection of wood and rubber foreign bodies, with 90% specificity;2 while high-frequency ultrasound had a 90% sensitivity and 80% specificity for these same foreign bodies.Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can also potentially identify traditionally radiolucent foreign bodies such as wood. The sensitivity of these modalities depends on the material of the foreign body.  For suspected wooden foreign bodies, ultrasound is the favored modality.7

Due to its availability, sensitivity and specificity, ultrasound should be considered in the evaluation of foreign bodies. It can facilitate both the detection and removal of radiolucent foreign bodies.

Topics:

Point-of-care ultrasound, POCUS, radiolucent, radiopaque, X-ray, foreign body, wood foreign body.

References:

  1. Schlager D. Ultrasound detection of foreign bodies and procedure guidance. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1997;15(4):895-912. doi: 1016/S0733-8627(05)70338-2
  2. Jarraya M, Hayashi D, de Villiers RV, et al. Multimodality imaging of foreign bodies of the musculoskeletal system. AJR Am J Roentgenology. 2014;203(1):W92-W102. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11743
  3. Blankenship RB, Baker T. Imaging modalities in wounds and superficial skin infections. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2007;25(1):223-234. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2007.01.011
  4. Broder, J. Imaging the extremities. In: Broder J, ed. Diagnostic Imaging for the Emergency Physician. New York, NY: Elsevier Saunders; 2011:748-846.
  5. Turkcuer I, Atilla R, Topacoglu H, et al. Do we really need plain and soft-tissue radiographies to detect radiolucent foreign bodies in the ED?Am J Emerg Med. 2006;24(7):763-768. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.03.013
  6. Geria R. Ultrasound guided procedures – V. Foreign body localization. Sonoguide. https://www.acep.org/sonoguide/foreign_bodies.html. Accessed October 1, 2018.
Icon

Radiolucent Foreign Body - Case Report

1 file(s) 791 KB
Download
Icon

Radiolucent Foreign Body - Images

1 file(s) 510 KB
Download
Issue 4:1Ultrasound

Reviews:

No ratings yet.

Please rate this





Creative Commons images

Open Globe with Intraocular Foreign Body

29 Dec, 18
Creative Commons images

Intramural Hematoma with Type B Aortic Dissection

29 Dec, 18

JETem is an online, open access, peer-reviewed, journal-repository for EM educators. We are PMC Indexed.

Most Viewed

  • The Silent Saboteur: Teaching the Clinical Implications of Occult Hypoxemia & Social Determinants of Health via a Pulmonary Embolism Case
  • Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection
  • My Broken Heart
  • Stabilization of Cardiogenic Shock for Critical Care Transport, a Simulation
  • Innovative Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Nerve Block Model for Training Emergency Medicine Physicians

Visit Our Collaborators

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

About

Education

Learners should benefit from active learning. JETem accepts submissions of team-based learning, small group learning, simulation, podcasts, lectures, innovations, curricula, question sets, and visualEM.

Scholarship

We believe educators should advance through the scholarship of their educational work. JETem gives educators the opportunity to publish scholarly academic work so that it may be widely distributed, thereby increasing the significance of their results.

Links

  • Home
  • Aim and Scope
  • Current Issue
  • For Reviewers
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Contact Us

Newsletter

Sign up to receive updates from JETem regarding newly published issues and findings.

Copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International