JETem
  • Home
  • About
    • Aim and Scope
    • Our Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQ
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
  • Visual EM
    • Latest Visual EM
    • Search Visual EM
    • Thumbnail Library
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit to JETem
    • Photo Consent
    • Policies
      • Peer Review Policy
      • Copyright Policy
      • Editorial Policy, Ethics and Responsibilities
      • Conflicts of Interest & Informed Consent
      • Open Access Policy
      • Acceptance Fee
  • For Reviewers
    • Instructions for JETem Reviewers
    • Interested in Being a JETem Reviewer?
  • Topic
    • Abdominal/Gastroenterology
    • Administration
    • Board Review
    • Cardiology/Vascular
    • Certifying Exam Cases
      • Clinical Decision-Making
      • Prioritization
      • Communication
      • Procedure & Ultrasound
    • Clinical Informatics, Telehealth and Technology
    • Dermatology
    • EMS
    • Endocrine
    • ENT
    • Faculty Development
    • Genitourinary
    • Geriatrics
    • Hematology/Oncology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Miscellaneous (stats, etc)
    • Neurology
    • Ob/Gyn
    • Ophthalmology
    • Orthopedics
    • Pediatrics
    • Pharmacology
    • Procedures
    • Psychiatry
    • Renal/Electrolytes/Nutrition
    • Respiratory
    • Social Determinants of Health
    • Toxicology
    • Trauma
    • Ultrasound
    • Urology
    • Wellness
    • Wilderness
  • Modality
    • Certifying Exam Practice Cases
      • Clinical Care Cases
      • Communication & Procedural Cases
      • Old School Oral Board Cases
    • Curricula
    • Innovations
    • Lectures
    • Podcasts
    • Simulation
    • Small Group Learning
    • Team Based Learning (TBL)
    • Visual EM
  • Contact Us

Awaiting Stress: An Interprofessional In-situ Simulation to Optimize Team Management of Cardiac Arrest in an Emergency Department Observation Unit

Ashley Christine Rider, MD, MEHP*, Michael Losak, MD*, Brooke Stimmel, RN^, Stephanie Galang, RN^, Jennifer Hunter, PA-C^, Kelly Roszczynialski, MD, MS*

*Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
^Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA

Correspondence should be addressed to Ashley Christine Rider, MD, MEHP at ashrider@stanford.edu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/M5.52393Issue 11:4
Cardiology/VascularCurrent IssueSimulation
[mrp_rating_result]

ABSTRACT:

Audience: This simulation is intended for interprofessional clinical decision unit (CDU) teams.

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) observation units or clinical decision units (CDU) are a common care model found in many hospitals due to their ability to provide high-quality care and reduce length of stay while also minimizing costs.1,2,3 Despite initial clinical stability, deterioration while in the CDU may occur. Due to the unique environment of the CDU, it is essential that the interprofessional team is prepared to manage unstable patients; yet there is minimal literature on how to best train observation unit teams.

Educational Objectives:  By the end of this simulation session, learners will be able to: 1) prioritize and coordinate team-based tasks within the CDU environment upon recognizing patient decompensation and cardiac arrest, 2) optimize clinical decision unit (CDU) team member roles and interprofessional communication, 3) adapt resuscitation principles in the resource-variable setting of a CDU to manage a critically ill patient.

Educational Methods:  This is run as an in-situ simulation with an interprofessional team as an experiential learning intervention. The in-situ format enables exploration of the team-specific and unit-specific context during the debrief.

Research Methods: Participants completed a pre- and post-self-assessment via QR code along with responses to three program evaluation questions.

Results: Twenty-five team members participated in six in-situ CDU simulations. On the pre-assessment, participants had a median of 4 (scale of 1- strongly disagree to 5 – strongly agree) across all categories including confidence in their role during a Code Blue, roles of team members, team priorities, trust in team members, equipment location, and comfort in providing hand-off. On the post-assessment, team priorities and trust in team members increased to a median of 5. In the program evaluation, participants found the experience valuable, particularly the debrief.

Discussion: Team members started the simulation with confidence in cardiac arrest management, but participation increased their understanding of trust in team members and team priorities within the CDU context. This simulation and debrief session could help support team performance during cardiac arrest within the distinct clinical and interprofessional environment of the CDU.

Topics: Simulation, Clinical Decision Unit, CDU, short stay unit, interprofessional, cardiac arrest, debriefing.

Icon

Awaiting Stress – Manuscript

1 file(s) 1.41 MB
Download
Icon

Awaiting Stress - Supplemental File

1 file(s) 1.85 MB
Download
Issue 11:4

Reviews:

[mrp_rating_entry_details_list layout="inline" show_rating_items="false"][mrp_rating_form]

The Challenge of Critical Feedback: A...

31 Oct, 26

Meeting the Milestones through Simulation:...

31 Oct, 26

JETem is an online, open access, peer-reviewed, journal-repository for EM educators. We are PMC Indexed.

Most Viewed

  • A Low-Cost Rectal Foreign Body Removal Simulator
  • Priapism got you down? A novel method to build your own moderate fidelity task trainer
  • Cadaveric Model of Pneumothorax (the GASP model): A Realistic, Reusable and Cost-Effective Simulator for Chest Drainage Training
  • Clinical Decision Making: Sickle Cell Crisis with Acute Chest Syndrome
  • Physical Wellbeing Scavenger Hunt

Visit Our Collaborators

 

 

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

About

Education

Learners should benefit from active learning. JETem accepts submissions of team-based learning, small group learning, simulation, podcasts, lectures, innovations, curricula, question sets, and visualEM.

Scholarship

We believe educators should advance through the scholarship of their educational work. JETem gives educators the opportunity to publish scholarly academic work so that it may be widely distributed, thereby increasing the significance of their results.

Links

  • Home
  • Aim and Scope
  • Current Issue
  • For Reviewers
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Contact Us

Newsletter

Sign up to receive updates from JETem regarding newly published issues and findings.

Copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International